| Discussion 1 Construct a Deductively Valid Argument |
| ON ****** Universal Healthcare******** | ||
| The topic of this week is deductive reasoning. Accordingly, in this discussion your task is to create a deductively valid argument for your position (the same position that you defended in the Week One discussion). | ||
 |
Prepare: To prepare to respond to this prompt, make sure to read carefully over the required portions of Chapter 3 and Chapter 4. View the deLaplante (2013) video What Is a Valid Argument? as well as the other required media for the week. For more guidance about how to construct a valid argument for a controversial position, review the Constructing a Valid Argument video and the document How to Construct a Valid Deductive Argument . Based on the sources, create a deductively valid argument for the position you defended in the Week One discussion. | |
|
Reflect: To make your argument deductively valid, you will need to make sure that there is no possible way that your premises could be true and your conclusion false. Your premises must lead logically to the truth of your conclusion. Make sure that your argument is sound, that is in addition to being valid, make sure that the premises are true as far as you can tell. If your argument is invalid or if it has a false premise, revise it until you get an argument that you can stand behind. | |
|
Write: Identify the components and structure of your argument by presenting your deductively valid argument in standard form, and explain how your conclusion follows from your premises.
Discussion 2 Deductive Logic
Week 2, Prompt option #2: Fill in the Missing Premises We have learned this week about deductive reasoning, including what it takes for an argument to be valid. This discussion allows us to get more practice with the concept through making arguments valid. You will see a list of arguments here. These arguments are not presented in standard form, and each is missing a premise that would be necessary to make it valid. Your tasks will be to put the argument into standard form and add the missing premise that would validly link the premises to the conclusion. Prepare: To prepare to respond to this prompt, reread the section from Chapter 2 of our book titled “Extracting Arguments in Standard form,” all required portions of Chapters 3 and 4, as well as the guidance and required media for this week. Further assistance in the filling missing premises can be gained from the document How to Construct a Valid Main Argument and the video Constructing Valid Arguments . Reflect: Look at the list of argument options below. Choose an argument that has not yet been chosen by any of your classmates. Think through the reasoning and determine what premise is (or premises are) missing that would be needed to make the argument valid. You might also consider challenging yourself by choosing from the more difficult examples in the list (at the bottom).
Choose from the following list of argument options. #21. I can’t go to the party because there will be alcohol there, and I am a Mormon.
|
Discussion 1
Construct a Deductively Valid Argumen
t
ON ******
Universal Healthcare********
The topic of this week is deductive reasoning. Accordingly, in this
discussion your task is to create a deductively valid argument for your
position (the same
position that you defended in the Week One
discussion).
Prepare:
To prepare to respond to this prompt, make sure to read
carefully over the required portions of Chapter 3 and Chapter 4. View
the deLaplante (2013) video
What Is a Valid Argument?
as well as the
other required media for the week. For more guidance about how to
construct a valid argument for a controversial position, review
the
Constructing a Valid Argument
video and the document
How to
Construct a Valid Deductive Argument
. Based on the sources, create
a deductively valid argument for the position you defended in the
Week One discu
ssion.
Reflect:
To make your argument deductively valid, you will need to
make sure that there is no possible way that your premises could be
true and your conclusion false. Your premises must lead logically to
the truth of your conclusion. Make sure that your argument is
sound,
that is in addition to being valid, make sure that the premises are true
as far as you can tell. If your argument is invalid or if it has a false
premise, revise it until you get an argument that you can stand behind.
Write:
Identify the compo
nents and structure of your argument by
presenting your deductively valid argument in standard form, and
explain how your conclusion follows from your premises.
Discussion 2
Deductive Logi
c
Week 2, Prompt option #2:
Fill in the Missing Premises
We have learned this week about deductive reasoning, including what
it takes for an argument to be
valid
. This discussion allows us to get
more practice with the concept through making arguments valid
. You
will see a list of arguments
here
. These arguments are not presented
in standard form, and each is missing a premise that would be
necessary to make it valid. Your tasks will be to put the argument into
standard form and add the missing premise that
would validly link the
premises to the conclusion.
Prepare
: To prepare to respond to this prompt, reread the section
Discussion 1 Construct a Deductively Valid Argument
ON ****** Universal Healthcare********
The topic of this week is deductive reasoning. Accordingly, in this
discussion your task is to create a deductively valid argument for your
position (the same position that you defended in the Week One
discussion).
Prepare: To prepare to respond to this prompt, make sure to read
carefully over the required portions of Chapter 3 and Chapter 4. View
the deLaplante (2013) video What Is a Valid Argument? as well as the
other required media for the week. For more guidance about how to
construct a valid argument for a controversial position, review
the Constructing a Valid Argument video and the document How to
Construct a Valid Deductive Argument . Based on the sources, create
a deductively valid argument for the position you defended in the
Week One discussion.
Reflect: To make your argument deductively valid, you will need to
make sure that there is no possible way that your premises could be
true and your conclusion false. Your premises must lead logically to
the truth of your conclusion. Make sure that your argument is sound,
that is in addition to being valid, make sure that the premises are true
as far as you can tell. If your argument is invalid or if it has a false
premise, revise it until you get an argument that you can stand behind.
Write: Identify the components and structure of your argument by
presenting your deductively valid argument in standard form, and
explain how your conclusion follows from your premises.
Discussion 2 Deductive Logic
Week 2, Prompt option #2: Fill in the Missing Premises
We have learned this week about deductive reasoning, including what
it takes for an argument to be valid. This discussion allows us to get
more practice with the concept through making arguments valid. You
will see a list of arguments here. These arguments are not presented
in standard form, and each is missing a premise that would be
necessary to make it valid. Your tasks will be to put the argument into
standard form and add the missing premise that would validly link the
premises to the conclusion.
Prepare: To prepare to respond to this prompt, reread the section
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”
The post Class Discussion On Premise Logic appeared first on nursing writers.
"Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"
